Ycocalyx: acute deficits, but great potential. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;87:300?0. 35. Reitsma S, Slaaf
페이지 정보
작성자
Beau
작성일
본문
Tsurukiri et al. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (2016) 24:13 DOI 10.1186/s13049-016-0205-ORIGINAL RESEARCHOpen AccessResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrolled haemorrahgic shock as an adjunct to haemostatic procedures in the acute care settingJunya Tsurukiri1*, Itsurou Akamine1, Takao Sato1, Masatsugu Sakurai1, Eitaro Okumura1, Mariko Moriya1, Hiroshi Yamanaka1 and Shoichi OhtaAbstractBackground: Haemorrhagic shock is a major cause of death in the acute care setting. Since 2009, our emergency department has used intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) catheters for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). Methods: REBOA procedures were performed by one or two trained acute care physicians in the emergency room (ER) and intensive care unit (ICU). IABO catheters were positioned using ultrasonography. Collected data included clinical characteristics, haemorrhagic severity, blood cultures, metabolic values, blood transfusions, REBOA-related complications and mortality. Results: Subjects comprised 25 patients (trauma, n = 16; non-trauma, n = 9) with a median age of 69 years and a median shock index of 1.4. REBOA was achieved in 22 patients, but failed in three elderly trauma patients. Systolic blood 4-Bromo-5-nitro-1H-indazole pressure significantly increased after REBOA (107 vs. 71 mmHg, p < 0.01). Five trauma patients (20 ) died in ER, and mortality rates within 24 h and 60 days were 20 and 12 , respectively. No REBOA-related complications were encountered. The total occlusion time of REBOA was significantly lesser in survivors than that in non-survivors (52 vs. 97 min, p < 0.01). Significantly positive correla.
관련자료
-
이전
-
다음
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.